In a new USA TODAY/Suffolk University poll, 61% said Trump is not honest and trustworthy and 59% said the same of Clinton.That’s partly because the Clintons have a “sloppy” history of dealing with their controversies that’s made them “vulnerable to the people who genuinely, sincerely and irrationally hate them,” said Gil Troy, author of .Tags: 106 and park datingNude cams no membership to chatdating scammer from ukwho is yo gotti datingspeed dating russiahumboldt dating siteOnline adult dating brussels
Though no investigation found criminal wrongdoing, it made them appear to be part “of that clubby, Arkansas community where people did favors for each other,” Troy said.
Clinton has a reflexive tendency to resist acknowledging a criticism or a gaffe.
That said, he also sees “a whole other thing" underpinning Clinton's honesty challenge "that is laden with gender expectations and healthy doses of sexism."Jean Harris, a women and politics expert at the University of Scranton, said it's a product of "how she's handled things combined with the pedestal effect."The “virtue advantage” is something women often capitalize on, from the Suffragettes, who ran on the fact that they were inherently good, to modern campaigns such as Florida’s 2010 gubernatorial race, where Democrat Alex Sink ran an unsuccessful campaign based on the theme of “leading with honesty and integrity.”It’s also something opponents seek to undercut.
“Because the cost of an ethical infraction is higher for a woman, campaigns against women candidates often use the well-worn strategy of launching negative attacks on character or values early in the campaign,” the handbook warns.
As a candidate and public figure, Clinton has run contrary to much of this advice.
Her carefully-worded responses to the uproar over her personal email system has been just the latest in a long line of examples of Clinton’s defensive posture exacerbating concerns about her trustworthiness.So when that perception’s tarnished, the results for women can be devastating, the handbook warns.In the 2016 race, both major party candidates are dealing with ethics issues — Clinton over her use of the email server and her relationship to donors of the Clinton Foundation and Donald Trump over lawsuits from former students and contractors.In this year's contest, a semiannual review by Politifact found 60% of Trump’s campaign claims to be false, to 13% of Clinton's.Yet “we talk a lot more about Clinton’s honesty problem,” Dittmar said.Just last week, the FBI released more records about about the email investigation, while it was reported that Trump paid the IRS a penalty over an illegal campaign donation.Recent research includes a Yale School of Management study that found the public is more willing to accept a mistake by a leader in a gender appropriate role."Doubts have been been there for the generations," she said, even as she allowed "there may be a double standard."Katie Packer, a Republican strategist who advised 2012 nominee Mitt Romney, found Clinton aligns with her female peers.In 20, Packer conducted surveys identifying Clinton’s potential vulnerabilities with female voters.“When the email thing popped up, it was a perfect opportunity to exploit the one thing we felt she was really vulnerable on.”In the spring of 2011, when Clinton was serving as secretary of State, her Gallup favorability rating was 66%.That is 26 points higher than today following years of investigations over the 2012 attack on the U. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, the revelation of her personal email system while at the State Department and her 2016 presidential campaign.